Sunday, December 29, 2019
Creative Writing Response The Lord Of The Flies
Creative Writing Response I crashed through the forest a pig far in front. I could feel the adrenaline pumping through my veins. All my senses were on high alert. I paused, something stood out. Something heavy and dark seemed to be flowing with the adrenaline and blood. A want, a need, a bloodlust. I looked up and saw what used to be the pig I was chasing after lying bloody and dismembered. Thatââ¬â¢s strange it didnââ¬â¢t seem to be killed by a spear. The carcass seemed clawed at and torn through. Suddenly a flash of movement startled me out of my gaze and right in front of me was a bloody, maggot filled, pig head. The Lord of the Flies started speaking to me. ââ¬Å"You have done very well, now let me show you how to really KILL a pig!â⬠Then it charged at me. As soon as its teeth sank into my neck, I woke up screaming and sweating in my bed. Nancy, my newly-wedded wife lay next to me, her eyes filled with concern and care. ââ¬Å"Are you ok?â⬠she asked. ââ¬Å"Iââ¬â¢m fineâ⬠I repl y. She still doesnââ¬â¢t know about what happened on that island 20 years ago. ââ¬Å"It was just a bad dreamâ⬠I said. The next morning I woke up and got breakfast ready. It was my sons first day of college. He is going to a very fancy school which I canââ¬â¢t remember the name. Nancy and I are driving him to school today for the orienteering. After we ate breakfast we were off. It was a relatively long drive and Jack Jr. was texting his friends the whole time. Once we arrived I was amazed at how big the school was. There where studentsShow MoreRelated The Nature of Death in Emily Dickinsons Poems Essay2263 Words à |à 10 Pagesnature of death in the poems, ââ¬Å"I felt a Funeral, in my Brain (280)â⬠, ââ¬Å"I Heard a fly Buzzââ¬âWhen I Diedââ¬â(465)ââ¬Å" and ââ¬Å"Because I could not stop for Deathââ¬â(712)â⬠. Emily Dickinson, who achieved more fame after her death, is said to be one of the greatest American poets of all time. Dickinson communicated through letters and notes and according to Amy Paulson Herstek, author of ââ¬Å"Emily Dickinson: Solitary and Celebrated Poet,â⬠ââ¬Å"Writing was the way she kept in touch with the worldâ⬠(15). Dickinsonââ¬â¢s style is uniqueRead MoreEssay Writing9260 Words à |à 38 PagesThe Essay Writing Process In Greek legend, the goddess of wisdom, Athena, was born fully armed from the head of Zeus. Unfortunately, this is the only recorded instance of instant wisdom. Especially in the medium of the written word, the communication of complex ideas is a processââ¬âa process that requires thinking and rethinking, working and reworking. The student who claims to have dashed off an A essay at one in the morning the night before it was due is either a liar or a genius. ThisRead MoreCreativity in Advertising15483 Words à |à 62 Pageslikely to be attracted to advertisements which concerns him and will be useful for him. In order to attract the attention of reader, it is necessary to provide relevant information. * I = Moving Interest: This is the second step to consumerââ¬â¢s response. It is called ââ¬Å"from eye to mindâ⬠or ââ¬Å"from attention to interestâ⬠. As attention should be favorable, interest also should be favorable. All good advertisements start with consumerââ¬â¢s point of interest. An advertiserââ¬â¢s approach should be to establishRead MoreSAT Top 30 Essay Evidence18536 Words à |à 75 PagesWilliam Shakespeare (ââ¬Å"To be? Or not to be?â⬠) ...................................................................... 29 Harry Potter by J.K. Rowling (Witches, Wizards, and Muggles!) .......................................................... 31 Lord of the Flies, by William Golding (Murderous schoolboys stranded on an island!) ......................... 33 The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald (The famous American novel) ................................................ 35 Historical Events: TheRead MoreAmerican Literature11652 Words à |à 47 PagesAmerican Literature - 1750-1800 Content: ï⠷ ï⠷ ï⠷ ï⠷ national mission and American character democratic utopia use of reason history is an act of individual and national self-assertion Genre/Style: ï⠷ ï⠷ ï⠷ ï⠷ ï⠷ political pamphlets travel writing highly ornate writing style fiction employs generic plots and characters fiction often tells the story of how an innocent young woman is tested by a seductive male Effect: ï⠷ ï⠷ ï⠷ ï⠷ patriotism grows instills pride creates common agreement about issues showsRead More8 stages of social development6628 Words à |à 27 PagesEmerge A social stage is more like an emerging wave than a rigid step. Each stage is simply a temporary, transitional plateau that forms in individual and collective minds. Some call them paradigms or levels of psychological existence. In other writings I refer to them as valueMEMES or bio/psycho/social/spiritual DNA-type scripts that inculcate their codes throughout a culture, and even migrate around the planet on CNN and in 747s. These are fluid, living systems rather than rigid hierarchical stepsRead MoreCase Studies: Sas Airline Ryanair80169 Words à |à 321 Pages............................................................................... 36 FIGURE 7 ââ¬â THE FIVE COMPETITIVE FORCES THAT DETERMINE INDUSTRY PROFITABILITY .............................................. 38 FIGURE 8 - INNOVATION CYCLES AS A RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CYCLES........................................................................... 44 FIGURE 9 ââ¬â THREE AEAS OF POTENTIAL INNOVATION......................................................................................................Read MoreLiterary Devices in Pride and Prejudice8198 Words à |à 33 Pagesof the novel ââ¬Å"Pride and Prejudiceâ⬠. It is necessary to tell, that the main aim of our work is analysis of lexical stylistic devices that are used in Jane Austenââ¬â¢s novel ââ¬Å"Pride and Prejudiceâ⬠as one of the peculiarities of the authorââ¬â¢s style of writing. The object of our research is the field of Stylistic devices in Jane Austenââ¬â¢s novels as a main feature of her style. According to the aim of research the following tasks have been determined: * To study theoretical works on stylistic devicesRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words à |à 1617 PagesDiagnostic Surveys for Creative Problem Solving 168 Problem Solving, Creativity, and Innovation 168 How Creative Are You ? 169 Innovative Attitude Scale 171 Creative Style Assessment 172 SKILL LEARNING 174 Problem Solving, Creativity, and Innovation 174 Steps in Analytical Problem Solving 174 Defining the Problem 174 Generating Alternatives 176 Evaluating Alternatives 176 Implementing the Solution 177 Limitations of the Analytical Problem-Solving Model 178 Impediments to Creative Problem Solving 178Read MoreWho Goes with Fergus11452 Words à |à 46 Pagesasking his readers to model Ferguss actions. He renounced all materialistic desires (including love) and sought a life of simplicity and spirituality, and danced upon the level shore because of it. The deep woods woven shade = the unknown. And in response to the previous comment, in my opinion I think that brazen cars is in reference to battle/warfare. Summary The poet asks who will follow King Fergus example and leave the cares of the world to know the wisdom of nature. He exhorts young men
Saturday, December 21, 2019
Contract Law And Social System - 2196 Words
In the institution of legal and social system, contract is the central pillar on which these institutions are standing. In order to understand the system, it is necessary to recognize that deduction is one of the means of the system and not the only end. The concept of contract law is not only to bind the parties under liabilities but also to work on the concept of consideration or promises made. In the concept of contract law, it is a well settled proposition that consent is considered to be the heart of a valid contract. Contract is an agreement that binds the parties either to perform an act or to refrain from doing any act in the future. There are three principles of a traditional contract which need to be present in order toâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦It invalidates the contract ââ¬Å"where the consent of the complainant has been procured by illegitimate pressureâ⬠. The situation in which duress is formulate by the opposing parties is, when there is no other way or other option but to agree on the new terms presented by the pressurized party. The remedy is that an affected party can take the other party into court on the basis of economic duress. The affected party in order to make its claim has to prove the following; 1. There must be a valid contract between the parties 2. There must be a threat from the other party to cancel the contract In commercial contracts or agreements, it is evident to make distinction between that is a lawful threat and what is consider to be an unlawful threat. Pressure is involved in all sort of agreements and business dealing but it is necessary to prove that one of the parties are more influencial as compared to the other party. We cannot claim that one of the parties have threaten the other parties that they would not enter into any future business contract, this type of threat doesnot create duress and invalidate the contract as everyone is entitled to find and choice whoever they feel like doing their business with. However, if the party threaten the other party to break the contract is a different issue. It is a settled principle that non-performance of a contract is per se unlawful, every party has a right to break the contract
Friday, December 13, 2019
Williams and Utilitarianism Free Essays
In his critique of Utilitarianism, Williams finds fault in the Utilitarian commitment to maximum utility in that it undermines the integrity of moral agents and denies people the projects and relationships they inherently value. Famously known as his ââ¬Å"Integrity Objectionâ⬠, this proposition is immediately very enticing in that it appeals to the idea of the invaluable and imperative nature of benevolence and compassion, versus the cold, impartial hand of Utilitarianism. That is not to say, however, that Utilitarians have been dealt a hefty criticism from which they have no defense. We will write a custom essay sample on Williams and Utilitarianism or any similar topic only for you Order Now While Williams may be correct in claiming that abandoning commitments or devaluing personal relationships may be counterintuitive, a Utilitarian could argue that his construction of ââ¬Å"integrityâ⬠is equally counterintuitive in that it would require one to override their intrinsic pursuit of self- preservation. Additionally, if we were to presuppose Williamsââ¬â¢ correctness, a Utilitarian could argue that the only plausible implementation of such a theory would mean valuing these emotional engagements above oneââ¬â¢s own agency, a scenario even more demanding and sacrificial of oneââ¬â¢s identity than the Utilitarian proposal. Williams directs this objection specifically toward Act-Utilitarianism, a branch of Utilitarian thought that deems the morally correct action as the one that produces the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. He claims that such a theory is incompatible with the aspect of human happiness that is found in the commitment to personal projects and relationships: ââ¬Å"Utilitarianism would do well then to acknowledge the evident fact that among the things that make people happy is not only making other people happy, but being taken up or involved in any of a vast range of projects. 1 While Utilitarians actually need lower order projects comprised of relationships and commitments in order to validate their higher order projects, the lower order projects will always serve the concerns of the first order. In turn, Williams asserts that such a compromise of emotional engagements for maximum utility usurps oneââ¬â¢s sense of self, consequently marring the distinct ion between oneââ¬â¢s commitment and oneââ¬â¢s identity: ââ¬Å"(â⬠¦ ) that criterion would eliminate any desire at all which was not blankly and in the most straightforward sense egoistic. Thus we should be reduced to frankly egoistic first-order projects, and- for all essential purposes- the one second-order utilitarian project of maximally satisfying first-order projects. â⬠2Abandoning certain commitments for the sake of another project can be acceptable, but when forced to relinquish those which a person deeply values, Williams argues they are robbed of ââ¬Å"a sense of oneââ¬â¢s moral identityâ⬠or what he describes as oneââ¬â¢s integrity. Williams offers us two scenarios to further exemplify his theory: ââ¬Å"Jimâ⬠, who is told by the edicts of utilitarianism to murder one innocent Amazon Indian in order to prevent twenty more being murdered, and ââ¬Å"Georgeâ⬠, a chemist who is (also by the parameters of Utilitarianism) forced to take a job creating weapons of mass destruction, since the balance-sheet of utilities shows that if George refuses, a far younger, more zealous chemist will carry the project along even further and more efficiently than George. While these scenarios may seem like far-fetched constructions meant to reveal Utilitarianism pursuing the wrong choice, Williams conversely (perhaps begrudgingly) admits that these would be the ââ¬Å"rightâ⬠choices for the given circumstances. The true problem, he argues, is 1? CITATION? 112? 2? CITATION? 113? ? hat the emphasis should not simply be on the ââ¬Å"rightnessâ⬠of the action but the considerations involved in reaching that conclusion. This is a feature of Utilitarianism Williams claims ââ¬Å"cuts out a consideration which for some others makes a difference to what they feel about such casesâ⬠. 3 He continues to explain that excluding such considerations denies our sense of personal accountability for our own actions and in turn ââ¬Å"makes integrity as a value more or less intelligibleâ⬠. In sum, if we were to reduce Williamââ¬â¢s entire integrity objection to its most salient points, they would be the following: the emotional commitments tha t are incompatible with the parameters of Act- Utilitarianism are not only impossible to abandon entirely but are an integral facet of human happiness, therefore creating a dilemma for the Utilitarian in that they must allow for it. The potential defense of a Utilitarian to Williamsââ¬â¢ objection begins with the examination of his construction of integrity, which he seems to define as oneââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"sense of selfâ⬠. Looking simply at this definition alone, it could be said that subjectivity suggested with this variety of integrity incorrectly presupposes that a personââ¬â¢s sense of their identity is always correct. Utilitarianism could make a claim for the value in assessing reality with the sort of impartiality that Williamsââ¬â¢ rejects, seeing as if one is not being appraised objectively, their sense of self is entirely contingent on their own conception. More importantly, and the crux of the Utilitarian defense, is that while Williamsââ¬â¢ is correct in his claim that abandoning these emotional entanglements is counterintuitive, maintaining such commitments are at odds with the human desire for self-preservation, a 3? CITATION? p99? 4? CITATION? p99? ? conflict that Utilitarianism not only recognizes but Williams does not offer any viable solution for. Based on his examples and criticisms of Utilitarianism, it could be inferred that Williams assumes that we have a moral obligation to help others in a time of crisis, that one has an inherent responsibility to compassion and benevolence. This is clearly in conflict with the Utilitarian theory that oneââ¬â¢s responsibility is to maximum utility, so even if the Utilitarian were to concede to Williams objection, it would be implausible to imagine a scenario in which the two could be regarded as being of equal value. In turn, the only option available to maintaining this ethos of selflessness would be to regard it as superior to maximum utility. This, a Utilitarian could argue, could prove to be extremely problematic. Firstly, it is extremely unrealistic to assume that people have the capacity to function entirely out of selflessness. Even though benevolence and emotional attachment can provide a certain level of happiness and fulfillment to a person, the expectation to unilaterally value the welfare of others over our own is not only implausible but ultimately self-defeating. Abandoning or betraying commitments in order to further advance a larger more important agenda certainly isnââ¬â¢t an idea particular to Utilitarianism. A quick browse of a history textbook would support that, by and large, humans are inherently self-serving and while one may commit to an act, cause or person, it does not necessarily mean that they themselves arenââ¬â¢t using such relationships for their own agency. Utilitarianism may require that a person abandon a particular commitment for the sake of the reater good, but it can certainly be said that in the absence of utilitarianism, the commitment could be abandoned anyway, except in this case it would be for a self-serving purpose. A Utilitarian could potentially argue that their moral theory simply recognizes and curbs the inwardly focused desires of mankind and attempts to redirect such motivation toward the greater good. One could argue that Williamsââ¬â¢ is somewhat disillusioned with mankind as he makes sweeping id ealizations of the human psyche. Williamsââ¬â¢ examples of ââ¬Å"Jimâ⬠and ââ¬Å"Georgeâ⬠seem to both be contingent on the idea that what makes said examples disconcerting is premise that both men would be acting against their conscience, in turn making the assumption that all people have consciences that should be considered. Secondly, if one could clear the hurdle of the first argument, the actual implementation of such a theory is extremely difficult. Williams argues that Utilitarianism is far too demanding to be plausible but in fact, trading this impartiality for benevolence proves to be far more exhausting. Considering the worldââ¬â¢s current state of affairs, there are always people in dire need of help, so one calls into question exactly what parameters would be set in place in order to orchestrate such a society. What would be the stipulations of a worthy recipient of anotherââ¬â¢s benevolence? If Williams was simply talking about peopleââ¬â¢s obligation to those close to them, valuing those relationships above maximum utility creates a bias that is even more incompatible with benevolence than Utilitarianism, which at least works in the interest of the entire population. A Utilitarian could also argue that it simply because they are outweighed by maximum utility does not mean that substantial relationships are not valued in Utilitarianism. While they are indeed lower order projects, a Utilitarian could make an argument that it is through maintaining such relationships that the value of oneââ¬â¢s own welfare is realized and are only outweighed by serious interests of first order projects. The analyses above reflect the same conclusion. Williamsââ¬â¢ objection brings to light shortcomings in Utilitarianism that are easily felt by those uncomfortable with the impartial and seemingly unfeeling Utilitarian mentality. However, the arguments put forth by Williams regarding the counterintuitive and overly demanding nature of impartiality neglect the similarly inherent and insatiable desire for self-preservation. How to cite Williams and Utilitarianism, Papers
Thursday, December 5, 2019
Issues for It Security Personnel-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp
Question: Discuss about the Ethical Issues for It Security Personnel. Answer: Ethics is an area of study that deals with moral principles. These principles are what determine the morally upright thing to do or action to take when faced with a certain difficulty or dilemma (Himma Tavani, 2008). The information technology industry and specifically issues dealing with IT security involve a lot of ethical factors. It goes without saying that in trying to protect a company from external threats there are various ethical factors that professionals face such as not selling the information of one of their clients to another. In this paper we shall focus on the ethical issues that come up when a client asks you to save money by cutting out some security measures which you recommended based on your analysis of the clients security needs. The client here is of the opinion that saving money by cutting out some key security measures supersedes the need for having these security measures in place. The security needs show that sensitive information will be at risk if these security measures are not implemented. The two main ethical issues that are associated with the case study are security and increased pressure on IT professionals. Security in our case is such that the client wants to cut cost by foregoing implementation of the recommended security measures you gave them (Moore, 2005). The pressure on the IT professional is such that they have done a lot of work in defining the security loopholes then the client asks them to ignore them. The IT professional knows that the recommended security measures are necessary to keep the system secure. It is not ethical when the client requests the IT professional to implement a less secure network. This is because they want to save money so that they cannot use it in securing their company IT systems. If there is a security breach because the client does not wish to implement the recommended measures they might lose a lot of money and credibility as compared to the amount in which they are trying to save. The reputation of the IT professional is al so at risk because other clients and people might think that his or her services are not good because even after performing a security audit their client was still breached. Unless the IT professional went explaining to every potential client the mistake of their previous client then their reputation is in bad shape and they might miss out on many other future business ventures since no one has confidence in them (Spinello Tavani, 2004). After explaining to the client that sensitive information will be at risk if they do not implement the recommended security measures the client is still of the opinion that their company being targeted is very rare and therefore they do not think the security measures are a priority. As an IT professional I would not configure the network in a less secure manner. This is because it is better to do a thorough job especially in IT rather than a mediocre job. If a security breach occurs it will not be the client who suffers but also the services and reputation of the IT professional will be in question. I do not think it is ethical to eat the cost and install the extra security measures at no cost to the client. It might be a noble thing to do but one major drawback is that other companies might try to implement this strategy when engaging your services (Tavani, 2004). In such a case they will take advantage of you and you will always be at a loss since the company will continue making money and you will not have been paid for your services. Ethics is a major part of life and business. It is the same in such a case because if ethics was upheld the client would not try to compromise the reputation of the IT professional (Luciano, 2010). They would simply bear the problem on their own. If I was the IT professional tasked with this job I would not do what the client wishes so that they may be able to cut on cost. I would explain that the amount of losses they would have to incur if there were breaches would be far much more compared to the cost they were trying to save. As an ethical IT professional it is better that the client is disappointed with you not being able to fulfill their request (Terrell, 2014). They might not like your decision but in the long run they will respect you for giving them the best advice even if it is not what they wanted to hear. References Himma K. E. Tavani H. T. (2008). The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. John Wiley and Sons Inc. Luciano F. (2010). Information Ethics. The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 77-100. Moore A. D. (2005). Information Ethics: Privacy, Property and Power. University of Washington Press. Spinello R. A. Tavani H. T. (2004). Readings in Cyberethics. Jones and Bartlett Publishers. Tavani H. T. (2004). Ethics Technology: Ethical Issues in an Age of Information and Communication Technology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. Terrell B. (2014). Computer Ethics: Basic Concepts and Historical Overview. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Center for the Study of Language and
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)